4.7 Article

The neuroprotective activities of heteropolysaccharides extracted from Saccharina japonica

期刊

CARBOHYDRATE POLYMERS
卷 97, 期 1, 页码 116-120

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.carbpol.2013.04.055

关键词

Heteropolysaccharide; Neuroprotective activity; Saccharina japonica

资金

  1. Ocean Public Welfare Scientific Research Project
  2. State Oceanic Administration of the People's Republic of China [201005024]
  3. Doctorial Fund of Shandong Province [BS2011YY066]
  4. Science and Technology Project of Shandong Province [2011GHY11529]
  5. Science and Technology Program of applied basic research projects of Qingdao Municipal [12-1-4-8-(3)-jch]
  6. Prospective Joint Research Projects of Jiangsu Province [BY2011189]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Crude fucoidan extracted from Saccharina japonica was separated by anion-exchange chromatography. Then, the neuroprotective activities of the crude fucoidan (J) and its fractions (J0.4, J0.5, J1 and J2) were tested. J, J0.4 and J0.5 were shown to have neuroprotective effects. To simplify the structural features of the compounds, crude fucoidan was degraded to obtain low molecular weight fucoidan (DJ). DJ was further fractionated into DJ0.5, DJ1 and DJ2, and the neuroprotective activities of these fractions were determined. This analysis revealed that DJ and DJ0.5 retained the neuroprotective activity. However, the DJ0.5 fraction remained very complex. Thus, DJ0.5 was further separated into six fractions (F0.1, F0.2, F0.3, F0.4, F0.5 and F1). Finally, it was concluded that the anion-exchange fractions F0.1, F0.2 and F0.3 exhibited neuroprotective activities. These results suggest that heteropolysaccharides might contribute to the neuroprotective activity. Moreover, the neuroprotective heteropolysaccharide fractions contained relatively low fucose (less than 20%) and sulfate (25%), high UA content (more than 10%) and a high molar ratio of all other monosaccharides (C) 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据