4.7 Article

Molar mass characterization of sodium carboxymethyl cellulose by SEC-MALLS

期刊

CARBOHYDRATE POLYMERS
卷 95, 期 1, 页码 550-559

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.carbpol.2013.03.028

关键词

Carboxymethyl cellulose; Degree of substitution; Size exclusion chromatography; Light scattering; Molar mass characterization; Anhydroglycose unit; Cellulose derivatives

资金

  1. Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft [RA 952/6-1]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Two series of sodium carboxymethyl celluloses (NaCMCs) derived from microcrystalline cellulose (Avicel samples) and cotton linters (BWL samples) with average degrees of substitution (DS) ranging from DS = 0.45 to DS = 1.55 were characterized by size exclusion chromatography with multi-angle laser light scattering detection (SEC-MALLS) in 100 mmol/L aqueous ammonium acetate (NH4OAc) as vaporizable eluent system. The application of vaporizable NH4OAc allows future use of the eluent system in two-dimensional separations employing evaporative light scattering detection (ELSD). The losses of samples during filtration and during the chromatographic experiment were determined. The scaling exponent a(s) of the relation < s(2)>(1/2)similar to M-as was approx. 0.61, showing that NaCMCs exhibit an expanded coil conformation in solution. No systematic dependencies of a(s) on DS were observed. The dependences of molar mass on SEC-elution volume for samples of different DS can be well described by a common calibration curve, which is of advantage, as it allows the determination of molar masses of unknown samples by using the same calibration curve, irrespective of the DS of the NaCMC sample. Since no commercial NaCMC standards are available, correction factors were determined allowing converting a pullulan based calibration curve into a NaCMC calibration using the broad calibration approach. The weight average molar masses derived using the so established calibration curve closely agree with the ones determined by light scattering, proving the accuracy of the correction factors determined. (c) 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据