4.7 Article

Amylose content in starches: Toward optimal definition and validating experimental methods

期刊

CARBOHYDRATE POLYMERS
卷 88, 期 1, 页码 103-111

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.carbpol.2011.11.072

关键词

Starch; Amylose; Amylopectin; Chromatography; GPC; Iodine colorimetry; Chain-length distribution

资金

  1. Australian Research Council [DP0985694]
  2. Knut and Alice Wallenberg Foundation (Sweden)
  3. Australian Research Council [DP0985694] Funding Source: Australian Research Council

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A new analytical method to define and quantify the amylose content in starches is developed using two-dimensional (2D) macromolecular size/branch chain-length distributions obtained by multidimensional size-exclusion chromatography (SEC, also known as GPC) and enzymatic debranching. This method permits clear separation of amylose (low molecular weights, a small number of long-chain branches), amylopectin (high molecular weights, a large number of short-chain branches), long-chain-branched amylopectin and intermediate components. The results are applied to rice starch, normal maize starch, and two high-amylose starches (Gelose 50 and Gelose 80) and used to validate four single-quantity techniques for measuring amylose content: iodine colorimetry, concanavalin A precipitation, and 10 SEC debranched (or chain-length) and branched distributions. Quantitatively accurate amylose contents can be obtained with the first three single-quantity methods for starch samples with clear separation of the amylose and amylopectin populations, but the 10 SEC branched distribution seriously overestimates the values compared to the other techniques. For high-amylose starches, the definition of amylose content must be taken with caution: it is impossible to separate the different macromolecular populations unambiguously because of the higher abundance of hybrid species. The 2D structural method serves as a reference to identify amylose content and validate single-quantity analytical procedures. (C) 2011 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据