4.7 Article

Ultrasonic-assisted extraction, antimicrobial and antioxidant activities of Cyclocarya paliurus (Batal.) Iljinskaja polysaccharides

期刊

CARBOHYDRATE POLYMERS
卷 89, 期 1, 页码 177-184

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.carbpol.2012.02.068

关键词

Ultrasonic-assisted extraction; Cyclocarya paliurus (Batal.) Iljinskaja; Polysaccharides; Response surface methodology; Antioxidant activity; Antimicrobial activity

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [31130041]
  2. State Key Laboratory of Food Science and Technology, Nanchang University, China [SKLF-QN-201104, SKLF-MB-201001]
  3. Educational Commission of Jiangxi Province, China [GJJ10049]
  4. National Key Technology R & D Program of China [2012BAD33B06]
  5. Natural Science Foundation of Nanchang University, China [2009NDXJ30]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Recently. renewed interest has grown in the use of ultrasonic-assisted extraction as an alternative approach to the traditional extraction methods. In this study, this novel extraction method was used to isolate polysaccharides from Cyclocarya paliurus (Batal.) Iljinskaja, and response surface methodology (RSM) was employed to optimize the extraction conditions. The optimal conditions for the extraction of polysaccharides were determined to be the ratio of liquid to solid of 8, extraction time of 59 min and extraction temperature of 58 degrees C. Under these optimal conditions, the yield of polysaccharides obtained was 4.91 +/- 0.11%, which was well matched with the value predicted by the model. In vitro antioxidant assays showed that the polysaccharides exhibited strong DPPH radicals (92.09% at 0.25 mg/ml) anti self-oxidation of 1,2,3-phentriol (37.22% at 1 mg/ml) scavenging activities, moderate hydroxyl radicals (43.18% at 1 mg/ml) scavenging activity and lipid peroxidation inhibitory effect (31.66% at 1 mg/ml). In addition, the polysaccharides showed moderate antimicrobial activity. (c) 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据