4.7 Article

Molar mass characterization of cellulose acetates over a wide range of high DS by size exclusion chromatography with multi-angle laser light scattering detection

期刊

CARBOHYDRATE POLYMERS
卷 88, 期 1, 页码 96-102

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.carbpol.2011.11.071

关键词

Cellulose acetate; Degree of substitution; Size exclusion chromatography; Light scattering; Molar mass characterization

资金

  1. Deutscher Akademischer Austauschdienst (DAAD)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A series of cellulose acetate (CA) samples with an average degree of substitution (DS) ranging from DS = 1.5 to DS = 2.3 was synthesized by partial saponification of a high DS sample (DS = 2.6). The comparison of the theoretical DS-values with ones determined by H-1 NMR showed that the deacetylation reaction can be well controlled by the amount of sodium hydroxide (NaOH) added. The average molar masses of the samples and their molar mass distributions were characterized by size exclusion chromatography (SEC) with multi-angle laser light scattering (MALLS) detection in N,N-dimethyl acetamide (DMAc) containing 250 mmol/L lithium chloride (LiCl) in order to effectively suppress aggregation of the samples. The dependences of molar mass versus elution volume for samples of different DS can be well described by a common calibration curve. This allows using the same calibration curve for determination of molar masses of unknown samples, irrespective of their DS. A comparison of the absolute molar masses determined by light scattering with the molar masses obtained using a poly(methylmethacrylate) (PMMA) calibration curve revealed that the PMMA equivalent molar masses overestimated the absolute molar masses by a factor of approximately 3. Correction factors were determined making it possible to convert a PMMA calibration curve into a CA calibration curve. This procedure allows determination of correct CA molar masses based on commercially available PMMA-standards without using a LS instrument for samples in the DS range investigated. (C) 2011 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据