4.7 Article

Green composite films composed of nanocrystalline cellulose and a cellulose matrix regenerated from functionalized ionic liquid solution

期刊

CARBOHYDRATE POLYMERS
卷 84, 期 1, 页码 383-389

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.carbpol.2010.11.050

关键词

All-cellulose films; Nanocomposite; Nanoparticle-reinforced composites; Mechanical properties; Ionic liquid

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21072077, 20672046]
  2. Guangdong Natural Science Foundation [10151063201000051, 8151063201000016]
  3. Department of Education of Guangdong Province [cgzhzd0709]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

By using the excellent selective solubility of the hydroxyl functionalized ionic liquid, 1-(2-hydroxylethyl)-3-methyl imidazolium chloride ([HeMIM]CI), to the pretreated microcrystalline cellulose (PMCC) and nanocrystalline cellulose (NCC), a green all-cellulose nanocomposite film, in which both the fibers and the matrix are cellulose, was easily prepared via adding NCC to the cellulose ionic liquid solution. It was found that the PMCC can be efficiently dissolved in [HeMIM]CI, whereas NCC slightly dissolved in it. The morphology, crystalline structure, thermal stabilities, mechanical and optical properties of the as-prepared film were characterized by X-ray diffraction (XRD), thermal gravimetric analysis (TGA), scanning electron microscope (SEM), optical transmittance and mechanical testing. The nanocomposite films showed good optical transparency, thermal stabilities and mechanical properties as the result of reinforcement by increasing the content of NCC. But, with the content of NCC increased from 5% to 25%, the decomposition temperature and elongation at break decreased obviously. This work demonstrated a promising route for the preparation of biodegradable green all-cellulose nanocomposites. In addition, this all-cellulose nanocomposite composite is composed of sustainable biodegradable resources, which give it to be benign to environment. (C) 2010 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据