4.2 Article

Role of nitric oxide in the genotoxic response to chronic microcystin-LR exposure in human-hamster hybrid cells

期刊

JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
卷 29, 期 -, 页码 210-218

出版社

SCIENCE PRESS
DOI: 10.1016/j.jes.2014.07.036

关键词

Microcystin-LR (MC-LR); Chronic exposure; Genotoxicity; Nitric oxide

资金

  1. National Basic Research Program (973) of China [2014CB932002]
  2. Chinese Academy of Sciences Strategic Priority Research Program [XDB14030502]
  3. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21177133, U1232144]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Microcystin-LR (MC-LR) is the most abundant and toxic microcystin congener and has been classified as a potential human carcinogen (Group 2B) by the International Agency for Research on Cancer. However, the mechanisms underlying the genotoxic effects of MC-LR during chronic exposure are still poorly understood. In the present study, human-hamster hybrid (A(L)) cells were exposed to MC-LR for varying lengths of time to investigate the role of nitrogen radicals in MC-LR-induced genotoxicity. The mutagenic potential at the CD59 locus was more than 2-fold higher (p < 0.01) in A(L) cells exposed to a cytotoxic concentration (1 mu mol/L) of MC-LR for 30 days than in untreated control cells, which was consistent with the formation of micronucleus. MC-LR caused a dose-dependent increase in nitric oxide (NO) production in treated cells. Moreover, this was blocked by concurrent treatment with the NO synthase inhibitor N-G-methyl-L-arginine (L-NMMA), which suppressed MC-LRinduced mutations as well. The survival of mitochondrial DNA-depleted (rho(0)) A(L) cells was markedly decreased by MC-LR treatment compared to that in A(L) cells, while the CD59 mutant fraction was unaltered. These results provided clear evidence that the genotoxicity associated with chronic MC-LR exposure in mammalian cells was mediated by NO and might be considered as a basis for the development of therapeutics that prevent carcinogenesis. (C) 2015 The Research Center for Eco-Environmental Sciences, Chinese Academy of Sciences.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据