4.6 Article

Molecular adsorption of NO on NiO(100): DFT and DFT+U calculations

期刊

PHYSICAL REVIEW B
卷 71, 期 4, 页码 -

出版社

AMERICAN PHYSICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevB.71.045405

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Following our former study of the CO/NiO(100) system [Phys. Rev. B 69, 075413 (2004)], we have investigated the geometrical, electronic, and magnetic properties of NO adsorbed on NiO(100) to further elucidate the role of strong electron correlations in the substrate on the chemisorption of small molecules. As for CO/NiO(100), density-functional theory (DFT, both in the local-density and in the generalized gradient approximations) strongly overestimates the adsorption strength, but in contrast to CO, the strongly tilted adsorption geometry of NO is correctly predicted even at the DFT level. If strong electronic correlation in NiO are described by a DFT+U approach, the shift of the occupied Ni d states to higher binding energies nearly completely suppresses donation from the occupied 5sigma molecular orbital to the Ni d(z)(2) states and backdonation from the Ni d(xy,xz) orbitals to the partially filled (NO) 2pi* molecular orbital, the conventional bonding mechanism between a p-bonded molecular dimer and a transition-metal atom. DFT+U calculations predict NO to be almost unbound in an upright configuration. In a tilted configuration, a hybridization of the 2pi* molecular orbital with the Ni d(z)(2) states, which is symmetry forbidden in the upright configuration, provides an alternative mechanism for the formation of a weak covalent adsorbate-substrate bond. The energetic, geometric, vibrational, and magnetic properties of the adsorbate/substrate complex are strongly influenced by this alternative mechanism. Altogether our results demonstrate that, as suggested by earlier studies, the on-site Coulomb repulsion in the Ni d band plays a decisive role in the description of adsorption on transition-metal oxides and that DFT+U provides a sound description of chemisorption on these difficult systems.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据