4.8 Review

Gastrointestinal hormones and food intake

期刊

GASTROENTEROLOGY
卷 128, 期 1, 页码 175-191

出版社

W B SAUNDERS CO-ELSEVIER INC
DOI: 10.1053/j.gastro.2004.10.043

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Despite dramatic fluctuations in calorie intake, animals maintain a very stable body weight. The reason is that energy intake and expenditure are precisely matched. Long-term regulation of energy balance is dependent on the coordination and interpretation of signals such as those given by insulin and leptin indicating sufficient long-term energy stores as well as short-term, meal-related signals such as those given by cholecystokinin (CCK). Within the last 30 years, our knowledge of short-term signals has increased dramatically. Throughout the cephalo-caudal axis of the gastrointestinal system, discrete enteroendocrine cells respond to both mechanical and chemical stimulation. Meal-associated hormone release is dependent on the concentration and composition of the nutrients ingested. Released signals are transmitted neurally through vagal afferents or humorally as circulating ligands for specific receptor populations in the periphery and central nervous system. These signals are interpreted by the CNS and manifested as a behavioral modification of feeding. This review will present past and recent literature in support of gut hormones and their roles as mediators of satiety. Evidence from pharmacologic and physiologic studies involving both humans and rodents will be presented, along with a short section outlining the knowledge gained through the use of murine knockout models. Last, the contribution of satiety hormones as likely mediators of the effectiveness seen following obesity surgery will be reviewed. Although traditionally thought of as short-term, meal-related signals, enhanced, chronic hormone secretion and signaling resulting from gut reconstruction as seen with gastric bypass surgery most likely contributes to the superior efficacy of surgery as a treatment for obesity.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据