4.3 Article

Residues and potential health risks of DDTs and HCHs in commercial seafoods from two coastal cities near Yangtze River Estuary

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS INC
DOI: 10.1080/03601234.2015.982387

关键词

hexachlorocyclohexane; East China Sea; organochlorine pesticides (OCPs); Dichlorodiphenyltrichloroethane

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21177112, 21307023]
  2. Zhejiang Provincial Natural Science Foundation of China [Y13B070025, LQ14B07006]
  3. Scientific Research Fund of Zhejiang Provincial Education Department [Y201430811]
  4. Open Fund of Top Key Discipline of Environmental Science and Engineering of Zhejiang University of Technology [ESE20130302, ESE20130303]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Five species of commercial seafoods collected from the local markets in two coastal cities near Yangtze River Estuary (Ningbo and Zhoushan) in 2010 were analyzed to study the residues, potential sources, and health risks of dichlorodiphenyltrichloroethanes (DDTs) and hexachlorocyclohexanes (HCHs) in these areas. The total levels of DDTs and HCHs in the samples ranged from 1.13-20.2ng g(-1) and 1.23-3.05ng g(-1) wet weight, respectively, and were at a middle level compared with those from other marine systems. Results from one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) indicated species-specific distributions of DDTs and HCHs in the seafoods of the studied area, which may be related to their different lipid contents and ecological characteristics. Compositional analysis suggested that historical usage dominates in this area, and fresh inputs of lindane and dicofol may also have part contributions. With respect to DDTs, it can be metabolized into both DDD and DDE simultaneously in seafoods tested. Assessment based on maximum residue levels, acceptable or tolerable daily intakes, and hazard ratios for non-carcinogens suggested no obvious adverse health effects, while the lifetime cancer risks may be increased from dietary exposure to DDTs and HCHs.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据