4.5 Article

Positive feedback loop and synergistic effects between hypoxia-inducible factor-2 and stearoylCoA desaturase-1 promote tumorigenesis in clear cell renal cell carcinoma

期刊

CANCER SCIENCE
卷 104, 期 4, 页码 416-422

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/cas.12108

关键词

-

类别

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [81272841]
  2. Municipal Hospital Level Project for Emerging and Frontier Technology of Shanghai [SHDC 12010104]
  3. Shanghai Natural Science Foundation [10JC1409600]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Adapting to hypoxic stress is pivotal in tumor progression and determining tumor malignancy. The transcriptional factor hypoxia-inducible factor (HIF) is crucial in modulating tumorous hypoxic responses through altering cell energy metabolism, which includes the modification of glucose and lipid metabolism-associated gene expression. StearoylCoA desaturase-1 (SCD1) is the main isoform of SCDs, the rate-limiting enzymes in the biosynthesis of monounsaturated fatty acids from saturated fatty acids, which is extensively activated in cancer progression. In this study, we found that SCD1 and HIF-2 were overexpressed in human clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC) tissues and ccRCC cell lines, and were upregulated in the 786-0 ccRCC cell line under hypoxia. Knockdown of SCD1 or HIF-2 impacted the other's expression. Enhancing SCD1 resulted in HIF-2 upregulation, which could be blocked by inhibiting the PI3K/Akt pathway. Deficiency of SCD1 or HIF-2 in 768-0 cells led to apoptosis, less colony formation ability, and decreased cell migration. More obvious effects were observed in 786-0 cells with double SCD1 and HIF-2 knockdown. These results indicate a PI3K/Akt-mediated loop between SCD1 and HIF-2 that mutually enhances their protein levels. Both SCD1 and HIF-2 are critical to promoting tumorigenesis by synergistically acting on maintaining cell survival, triggering cell migration, and enhancing the colony formation ability of cancer cells. (Cancer Sci 2013; 104: 416-422)

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据