4.5 Article

Correlation of L-type amino acid transporter 1 and CD98 expression with triple negative breast cancer prognosis

期刊

CANCER SCIENCE
卷 103, 期 2, 页码 382-389

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/j.1349-7006.2011.02151.x

关键词

-

类别

资金

  1. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [23590388] Funding Source: KAKEN

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Triple negative breast cancer (TNBC) is a heterogeneous, aggressive cancer for which there is no effective chemotherapy or targeted therapy. We aimed to evaluate L-type amino acid transporter (LAT) 1 and CD98 expression immunohistochemically in patients with breast cancer, especially TNBC. Out of 129 patients, LAT1 was positive in 56 patients (43.4%), and CD98 was positive in 41 patients (31.8%). The positive ratio of LAT1 expression in luminal A cases was 7.9%, 30.0% in luminal B cases, 71.4% in HER2 cases and 64.0% in TN cases. HER2 and TN subtypes expressed LAT1 and CD98 at higher levels than luminal A and B subtypes (both P < 0.001). LAT1 and CD98 expression correlated with tumor size (LAT1, P = 0.010; CD98, P = 0.007), nuclear grade (LAT1, P < 0.001; CD98, P < 0.001) and Ki67 labeling index (LAT1, P < 0.001; CD98, P = 0.001). LAT1 and CD98 expression was negatively associated with ER and PgR (both P < 0.001). In TNBC, the 5-year disease-free rate of CD98+ (63.6%) or LAT1+/CD98+ (61.9%) patients was significantly worse than that of CD98- (89.3%) patients or those with no co-expression of LAT1 and CD98 (89.7%), respectively (P = 0.014, P = 0.009). The 5-year survival rates of CD98 positive/negative patients were 77.3% and 100% (P = 0.050), respectively, whereas that of patients with LAT1+/CD98+ (76.2%) was significantly worse (100%) (P = 0.040). Multivariate analysis confirmed that CD98+ or LAT1+/CD98+ expression were risk factors for relapse in TNBC (P = 0.023, P = 0.019). Thus, in the present study we show that LAT1 and CD98 expression are prognostic factors. Inhibition of these proteins might provide a new therapeutic strategy in TNBC. (Cancer Sci 2012; 103: 382389)

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据