4.5 Article

Prognostic significance of tumor/stromal caveolin-1 expression in breast cancer patients

期刊

CANCER SCIENCE
卷 102, 期 8, 页码 1590-1596

出版社

WILEY-BLACKWELL
DOI: 10.1111/j.1349-7006.2011.01985.x

关键词

-

类别

资金

  1. State Scholarship Foundation of China [2009659015]
  2. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [21591666] Funding Source: KAKEN

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Caveolin-1 (Cav-1) has been extensively characterized in cancer biological research. However, the role of Cav-1 in the interaction between tumor and stromal cells remains unclear. In the present study, we examined Cav-1 expression in tumor cells and stromal cells in breast cancer tissue by immunohistochemical analysis and evaluated its prognostic value in a training cohort. Immunohistochemical analysis of Cav-1 expression was scored as (++), (+) or (-) according to the proportion of positively stained tumor cells (T) and stromal cells (S). Correlation analysis between tumor/stromal Cav-1 expression and clinicopathological parameters revealed that only T(++) Cav-1 status was positively associated with tumor size and histological nodal status (P = 0.019 and 0.021, respectively). Univariate analysis revealed that combined T(++)/S(-) status was significantly correlated with unfavorable prognostic outcomes (P < 0.001). Multivariate analysis demonstrated that this combined status is an independent prognostic factor for primary breast cancer (P = 0.002). Clinical outcomes in different subgroups of breast cancer patients were also strictly dependent on this combined status (P < 0.05). The prognostic value of T(++)/S(-) Cav-1 status was also validated in the testing cohort. Collectively, our data indicate that high Cav-1 expression in tumor cells and lack of this expression in stromal cells could help identify a particular subgroup of breast cancer patients with potentially poor survival. Further studies are required to understand the regulatory mechanism of Cav-1 in the tumor microenvironment. (Cancer Sci 2011; 102: 1590-1596)

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据