4.8 Article

Characterization of the PCB substrate range of microbial dechlorination process LP

期刊

ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY
卷 39, 期 17, 页码 6831-6838

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/es050255i

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We have characterized the substrate range of Process LP, a PCB dechlorination activity mediated by anaerobic bacteria, in Housatonic River sediment (Lenox, MA). Process LP has the rare ability to remove unflanked para chlorines from polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs). We used 2,6-difluoro-4-chlorobiphenyl (DFCB) to activate Process LP in anoxic sediment microcosms and tested its ability to dechlorinate 34 potential PCB substrates, all of which are significant components of PCB mixtures found in contaminated sediments. We used gas chromatography-mass spectrometry to monitor the dechlorination of DFCB and PCBs and the appearance of products. The preferred substrates for Process LP were PCB congeners in which the target para chlorines were flanked by meta chlorines, such as those having 3,4- and 2,4,5-chlorophenyl rings. The unflanked para chlorines on PCBs with 2,4-, 2,4,6-, and sometimes 4-chlorophenyl rings, were also substrates. Furthermore, the data revealed that Process LP can also meta-dechlorinate 2,3-,2,3,4-, and 2,3,5-chlorophenyl groups on some congeners. A single ortho chlorine on the unattacked ring generally enhanced dechlorination activity, but the presence of 3 or 4 ortho chlorines or a 4-chlorophenyl group decreased the dechlorination efficiency. PCBs with 2,4-,2,4,6-,2,3-, and 2,3,5-chlorophenyl rings are often terminal dechlorination products of other microbial dechlorination activities. Since these PCBs are substrates for Process LP, this dechlorination activity works especially well in tandem with other dechlorination activities and further reduces the toxicity and persistence of PCBs. The data presented here will facilitate the construction of accurate models to interpret in situ PCB dechlorination and predict PCB fate.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据