4.5 Article

Hedgehog signaling pathway mediates the progression of non-invasive breast cancer to invasive breast cancer

期刊

CANCER SCIENCE
卷 102, 期 2, 页码 373-381

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/j.1349-7006.2010.01779.x

关键词

-

类别

资金

  1. Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology of Japan [18591439, 19390337, 19591511, 21390363]
  2. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [19591511, 18591439, 21390363, 19390337] Funding Source: KAKEN

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The purpose of this study is to clarify the contribution of the Hedgehog signaling pathway (Hh pathway) to the progression from ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) to invasive ductal carcinoma (IDC). A total of 149 surgically resected mammary disease specimens and 12 sentinel lymph nodes with micro-metastasis (Ly-met) were studied. The degree of Hh pathway activation was estimated from the Gli1 nuclear staining ratio (%Gli1 nuclear translocation) in cancer cells. The invasiveness of breast cancer cells was determined using Matrigel assays. A serial increase of %Gli1 nuclear translocation to IDC from non-neoplastic diseases was confirmed. In tumor specimens, %Gli1 nuclear translocation correlated with the invasiveness of each type of mammary disease and also correlated with invasion-related histopathological parameters. The %Gli1 nuclear translocation in lymph nodes with micro-metastasis was similar to that in primary sites and higher than that in DCIS with microinvasion and DCIS. Blockade of the Hh pathway decreased the invasiveness of breast cancer cells. In IDC, %Gli1 nuclear translocation correlated with the expression of estrogen receptor-a. Estrogen increased %Gli1 nuclear translocation and the invasiveness of estrogen receptor-a-positive cells. The Hh pathway mediates progression from a non-invasive phenotype to an invasive phenotype and %Gli1 nuclear translocation may be useful as a predictive marker for evaluating the ability of invasiveness. (Cancer Sci 2011; 102: 373-381)

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据