4.5 Article

Prevalence, awareness, treatment and control of hypertension in Portugal: the PAP study

期刊

JOURNAL OF HYPERTENSION
卷 23, 期 9, 页码 1661-1666

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/01.hjh.0000179908.51187.de

关键词

hypertension; prevalence; awareness; treatment; control; Portugal

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background The objective of this study was to estimate the prevalence and distribution of hypertension and to determine the status of hypertension awareness, treatment and control in the Portuguese adult population. Methods This study was conducted in 2003, and a multistage cluster sampling method was used to select a national representative sample. A total of 5023 adults, age 18-90 years, were examined. Three blood pressure measurements were obtained by trained observers using an OMROM M4-I sphygmomanometer after a 5-min sifting rest Information on the history of hypertension and the use of antihypertensive medications was obtained by use of a standard questionnaire. Results Hypertension was defined as a mean systolic blood pressure >= 140 mmHg and/or diastolic blood pressure >= 90 mmHg, or the use of antihypertensive medications. Overall, 42.1% of the Portuguese adult population aged 18-90 years, representing 3 311 830 people, had hypertension. The age-specific prevalence of hypertension in the three age groups studied - younger than 35 years, 35-64 years old and older than 64 years was 26.2, 54.7 and 79% in men and 12.4, 41.1 and 78.7% in women, respectively. Among hypertensive patients, only 46.1% were aware of their high blood pressure, 39.0% were taking antihypertensive medication and 11.2% achieved blood pressure control (<140/90 mmHg). Conclusions Our results indicate that hypertension is highly prevalent in Portugal. The percentages of those with hypertension that are aware, treated and controlled are unacceptably low. These results underscore the urgent need to develop national strategies to improve prevention, detection and treatment of hypertension in Portugal. (c) 2005 Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据