4.6 Article

Normalization of gene expression measurements in tumor tissues: comparison of 13 endogenous control genes

期刊

LABORATORY INVESTIGATION
卷 85, 期 1, 页码 154-159

出版社

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/labinvest.3700208

关键词

normalization; housekeeping gene; reference gene; control gene; real-time quantitative RT-PCR

向作者/读者索取更多资源

For interpretation of quantitative gene expression measurements in clinical tumor samples, a normalizer is necessary to correct expression data for differences in cellular input, RNA quality, and RT efficiency between samples. In many studies, a single housekeeping gene is used for normalization. However, no unequivocal single reference gene ( with proven invariable expression between cells) has been identified yet. As the best alternative, the mean expression of multiple housekeeping genes can be used for normalization. In this study, no attempt was made to determine the gold-standard gene for normalization, but to identify the best single housekeeping gene that could accurately replace the measurement of multiple genes. Expression patterns of 13 frequently used housekeeping genes were determined in 80 normal and tumor samples from colorectal, breast, prostate, skin, and bladder tissues with real-time quantitative RT-PCR. These genes included, large ribosomal protein, beta-actin, cyclophilin A, glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase, phosphoglycerokinase 1, beta-2-microglobin, beta-glucuronidase, hypoxanthine ribosyltransferase (HPRT), TATA-box-binding protein, transferrin receptor, porphobilinogen deaminase, ATP synthase 6, and 18S ribosomal RNA. Principal component analysis was used to analyze these expression patterns, independent of the level of expression. Our approach identified HPRT as the single best reference gene that could be used as an accurate and economic alternative for the measurement of multiple housekeeping genes. We recommend this gene for future studies to standardize gene expression measurements in cancer research and tumor diagnostics until a definite gold standard has been determined.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据