4.5 Article

Dkk-3 expression in the tumor endothelium: A novel prognostic marker of pancreatic adenocarcinomas

期刊

CANCER SCIENCE
卷 100, 期 8, 页码 1414-1420

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/j.1349-7006.2009.01208.x

关键词

-

类别

资金

  1. Osterreichischen Krebshilfe/Tirol

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Dkk-3 is proposed to be a new specific marker for tumor endothelial cells. Here we analyzed the clinical relevance of Dkk-3 expression in pancreas adenocarcinomas and determined its role on endothelial cell growth in vitro. Microvessel density in tumor samples was immunohistochemically determined using Dkk-3 and CD31 as endothelial cell markers, respectively. Based on the median microvessel density as a cut-off point, patients were categorized into high and low microvessel density groups and a correlation with survival and clinical parameters was assessed. Moreover, the role of Dkk-3 expression on chemosensitivity of endothelial cells was analyzed. In contrast to CD31 staining, Dkk-3-positive vessels were found only in tumor tissue and Dkk-3 microvessel density significantly correlated negative with tumor grading. In survival analysis the median survival time was 7 months for patients with Dkk-3 low, and 15 months for Dkk-3 high microvessel density (P = 0.0013). Subset analysis of patients receiving gemcitabine therapy showed that overall survival was significantly decreased in Dkk-3 low tumors than in high tumors (P = 0.009). In Cox regression Dkk-3 emerged as a significant independent parameter (P = 0.024). Dkk-3 overexpression in endothelial cells resulted in significantly enhanced growth inhibition after 5-fluorouracil or gemcitabine treatment compared to control endothelial cells and cancer cell lines. Dkk-3 low microvessel density was associated with tumor progression and worse clinical outcome. Overexpression of Dkk-3 enhanced endothelial cell growth inhibition to chemotherapeutic drugs. Therefore, we suggest that Dkk-3 high microvessel density may help to select patients who may benefit from chemotherapy. (Cancer Sci 2009).

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据