4.6 Article

Ganglioside GD1a restores infectibility to mouse cells lacking functional receptors for polyomavirus

期刊

JOURNAL OF VIROLOGY
卷 79, 期 1, 页码 615-618

出版社

AMER SOC MICROBIOLOGY
DOI: 10.1128/JVI.79.1.615-618.2005

关键词

-

类别

资金

  1. NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE [P01CA050661, R01CA082395] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER
  2. NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF ALLERGY AND INFECTIOUS DISEASES [R01AI031940] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER
  3. NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF DIABETES AND DIGESTIVE AND KIDNEY DISEASES [R01DK048106, R37DK048106, P30DK034854] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER
  4. NCI NIH HHS [P01 CA050661, R01 CA082395, P01 CA50661, R01CA-082395] Funding Source: Medline
  5. NIAID NIH HHS [AI-31940, R01 AI031940] Funding Source: Medline
  6. NIDDK NIH HHS [DK34854, DK48106, R01 DK048106, R37 DK048106, P30 DK034854] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Recent investigations on the pathway of cell entry by polyomavirus (Py) and simian virus 40 (SV40) have defined specific gangliosides as functional receptors mediating virus binding and transport from the plasma membrane to the endoplasmic reticulum (B. Tsai et al., EMBO J. 22:4346-4355, 2003; Gilbert and Benjamin, in press). These studies were carried out with C6 rat glioma cells, a heterologous host chosen for its known deficiency in ganglioside biosynthesis. Here, a cell genetic approach was undertaken to identify components required for the early steps of infection using mouse cells as the natural host for Py. Receptor-negative (R-) mouse cells, screened based on resistance to Py infection, were shown to bind Py but failed to allow entry of the virus. R- cells were also found to be resistant to SV40. Infectibility was restored or enhanced by the addition of the same specific gangliosides found in earlier studies with C6 cells. In one R- line, overexpression of caveolin-1 also increased infectibility. These results support and extend findings on gangliosides in lipid rafts as functional receptors and mediators of internalization for Py and SV40.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据