4.5 Article

Autophagy and autophagic cell death are next targets for elimination of the resistance to tyrosine kinase inhibitors

期刊

CANCER SCIENCE
卷 99, 期 11, 页码 2200-2208

出版社

WILEY-BLACKWELL
DOI: 10.1111/j.1349-7006.2008.00932.x

关键词

-

类别

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Autophagy, a cellular degradation system has been demonstrated in some hematopoietic malignant cell lines, but there is much still remaining to be known about its role and the mechanisms. We observed the excessive autophagy in chronic myelogenous leukemia (CML) cell line, K562, associated with treatment of 12-O-tetradecanoyl-phorbol-13-acetate (TPA), which can induce K562 cells to differentiate into megakaryocytic lineage. Confocal microscopic analysis demonstrated that autophagic cells did not express a megakaryocyte marker, the CD41 molecule, indicating that the autophagy was independent of megakaryocytic differentiation. After remarkable autophagic degradation, the cells finally underwent autophagic cell death (APCD). On the other hand, a block of TPA-induced autophagy by chloroquine rapidly promoted cell death that was not APCD. This result suggested that autophagy regulated two mechanisms in K562 cells: both the cell survival system and APCD. To confirm that autophagy regulates the cell survival system in K562 cells, imatinib was used to induce cell death in K562 cells. Autophagy has not been considered during imatinib treatment; nonetheless, co-treatment with imatinib and chloroquine markedly enhanced imatinib-induced cell death, compared to K562 cells treated only with imatinib. Furthermore, imatinib-resistant cell lines, BaF3/T315I and BaF3/E255K, also underwent cell death by co-treatment with imatinib and chloroquine. From these data, we concluded that autophagy is deeply related to the cell survival system and that inhibition of autophagy accelerates TPA- or imatinib-induced cell death. The block of autophagy could be a new strategy in the treatment of CML. (Cancer Sci 2008; 99: 2200-2208).

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据