4.5 Article

Prognostic impact and immunogenicity of a novel osteosarcoma antigen, papillomavirus binding factor, in patients with osteosarcoma

期刊

CANCER SCIENCE
卷 99, 期 2, 页码 368-375

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/j.1349-7006.2008.00695.x

关键词

-

类别

向作者/读者索取更多资源

To develop peptide-based immunotherapy for osteosarcoma, we previously identified papillomavirus binding factor (PBF) as a cytotoxic T lymphocytes (CTL)-defined osteosarcoma antigen in the context of human leukocyte antigen (HLA)-B55. In the present study, we analyzed the distribution profile of PBF in 83 biopsy specimens of osteosarcomas and also the prognostic impact of PBF expression in 78 patients with osteosarcoma who had completed the standard treatment protocols. Next, we determined the antigenic peptides from PBF that react with peripheral T lymphocytes of HLA-A24(+) patients with osteosarcoma. Immunohistochemical analysis revealed that 92% of biopsy specimens of osteosarcoma expressed PBF. PBF-positive osteosarcoma conferred significantly poorer prognosis than those with negative expression of PBF (P = 0.025). In accordance with the Bioinformatics and Molecular Analysis Section score, we synthesized 10 peptides from the PBF sequence. Subsequent screening with an HLA class I stabilization assay revealed that peptide PBF A24.2 had the highest affinity to HLA-A24. CD8(+) T cells reacting with a PBF A24.2 peptide were detected in eight of nine HLA-A24-positive patients with osteosarcoma at the frequency from 5 x 10(-7) to 7 x 10(-6) using limiting dilution/mixed lymphocyte peptide culture followed by tetramer-based frequency analysis. PBF A24.2 peptide induced CTL lines from an HLA-A24-positive patient, which specifically killed an osteosarcoma cell line that expresses both PBF and HLA-A24. These findings suggested prognostic significance and immunodominancy of PBF in patients with osteosarcoma. PBF is the candidate target for immunotherapy in patients with osteosarcoma.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据