4.7 Article

Monoclonal antibody to HER-2/neu receptor enhances radiosensitivity of esophageal cancer cell lines expressing HER-2/neu oncoprotein

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2004.05.017

关键词

esophageal cancer; radiosensitivity; trastuzumab; HER-2/neu

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Purpose: The role of HER-2/neu in the response of esophageal cancer to radiation is not well known. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of an anti-HER-2/neu antibody trastuzumab on the proliferation, cell cycle distribution, and radiosensitivity of esophageal cancer cell lines. Experimental Design: Expression of HER-2/neu protein by four esophageal squamous cancer cell lines (KE4, TE8, TE9, and TE10) and an esophageal adenocarcinoma cell line (SKGT4) was assessed using immunohistochemical (IHC) analysis and flow cytometry. We also evaluated HER-2/neu oncogene expression by fluorescence in situ hybridization. As a control for HER-2/neu protein expression and gene amplification, breast cancer cell lines (MCF7, MDA MB175VII, and SKBR3) were also examined. The cytotoxity of trastuzumab (0.1-200 mug/mL) was estimated by the MTT assay, and the cell cycle distribution was determined by flow cytometry. The effect of 10 mug/mL trastuzumab combined with radiation was assessed by a clonogenic assay. Results: Flow cytometry and IHC revealed that two esophageal cancer cell lines (TE9 and SKGT4) showed RER-2/neu expression (IHC 1+ and mean fluorescence intensity of 11-20), while the other esophageal cancer cell lines were negative for HER-2/neu expression. Although trastuzumab alone had no effect on the esophageal cancer cell lines, the combination of 10 mug/mL trastuzumab with radiation showed a synergistic effect on the HER-2/neu expressing cell lines. Conclusions: This study suggested that trastuzumab plus irradiation may be effective for the treatment of esophageal cancers, including adenocarcinoma and squamous cell cancer with HER-2/neu expression. (C) 2005 Elsevier Inc.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据