4.8 Article

Quantum dots to monitor RNAi delivery and improve gene silencing

期刊

NUCLEIC ACIDS RESEARCH
卷 33, 期 22, 页码 -

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/nar/gni188

关键词

-

资金

  1. NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE [U54CA119349] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER
  2. NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF DIABETES AND DIGESTIVE AND KIDNEY DISEASES [R01DK065152, R01DK056966] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER
  3. NCI NIH HHS [U54 CA119349, N01 CO37117] Funding Source: Medline
  4. NIDDK NIH HHS [R01 DK56966, R01 DK056966, R01 DK065152] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A critical issue in using RNA interference for identifying genotype/phenotype correlations is the uniformity of gene silencing within a cell population. Variations in transfection efficiency, delivery-induced cytotoxicity and 'off target' effects at high siRNA concentrations can confound the interpretation of functional studies. To address this problem, we have developed a novel method of monitoring siRNA delivery that combines unmodified siRNA with seminconductor quantum dots (QDs) as multi color biological probes. We co-transfected siRNA with QDs using standard transfection techniques, thereby leveraging the photostable fluorescent nanoparticles to track delivery of nucleic acid, sort cells by degree of transfection and purify homogenously-silenced subpopulations. Compared to alternative RNAi tracking methods (co-delivery of reporter plasmids and end-labeling the siRNA), QDs exhibit superior photostability and tunable optical properties for an extensive selection of non-overlapping colors. Thus this simple, modular system can be extended toward multiplexed gene knockdown studies, as demonstrated in a two color proof-of-principle study with two biological targets. When the method was applied to investigate the functional role of T-cadherin (T-cad) in cell-cell communication, a subpopulation of highly silenced cells obtained by QD labeling was required to observe significant downstream effects of gene knockdown.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据