4.8 Review

Review on calcium phosphate coatings produced using a sputtering process - an alternative to plasma spraying

期刊

BIOMATERIALS
卷 26, 期 3, 页码 327-337

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2004.02.029

关键词

sputter coatings; calcium phosphate; hydroxyapatite; biological responses; materials characterization

资金

  1. NCRR NIH HHS [1S10RR016879-01] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NIAMS NIH HHS [1R01AR46581] Funding Source: Medline
  3. NATIONAL CENTER FOR RESEARCH RESOURCES [S10RR016879] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER
  4. NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF ARTHRITIS AND MUSCULOSKELETAL AND SKIN DISEASES [R01AR046581] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER

向作者/读者索取更多资源

New promising techniques for depositing hydroxyapatite (HA) and calcium phosphate (CaP) coatings on medical devices are continuously being investigated. Given the vast number of experimental deposition process currently available, this review will focus only on CaP and/or HA coatings produced using the sputtering process. This review will discuss the characterization of sputtered CaP coatings before and after post-deposition treatments and tissue responses to some of the characterized coating surfaces. From the studies observed in the literature, current research on sputtered CaP coatings has shown some promises that may eliminate some of the problems associated with the plasma-spraying process. It has been generally accepted that sputtered HA and Cap coatings improve bone strength and initial osseointegration rate. However, optimal coating properties required to achieve maximal bone response are yet to be reported. As such, the use of well-characterized sputtered CaP and/or HA surfaces in the evaluation of biological responses should be well documented to avoid controversial results. In addition, future investigations of the sputtering process should include clinical trials, to continue the understanding of bone responses to coated-implant surfaces of different properties, and the possibility of coupling sputtered HA and CaP coatings with growth factors. (C) 2004 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据