4.6 Article

Analysis of polarization curves to evaluate polarization sources in hydrogen/air PEM fuel cells

期刊

JOURNAL OF THE ELECTROCHEMICAL SOCIETY
卷 152, 期 3, 页码 A635-A644

出版社

ELECTROCHEMICAL SOC INC
DOI: 10.1149/1.1860034

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A step-by-step technique to evaluate six sources of polarization, mainly associated with the cathode, in hydrogen/air proton exchange membrane fuel cells is demonstrated. The six sources of polarization were nonelectrode ohmic overpotential, electrode ohmic overpotential, nonelectrode concentration overpotential, electrode concentration overpotential, activation overpotential from the Tafel slope, and activation overpotential from catalyst activity. The technique is demonstrated as applied in the analysis of hydrogen/air polarization curves of an in-house membrane electrode assembly (MEA) using hydrogen/oxygen polarization curves as a diagnostic tool. The analysis results are discussed at three cell temperature/relative humidity (RH)/oxygen partial pressure (po(2), atm) conditions at atmospheric pressure: 80 degrees C/100% RHanode/75% RHcathode/Po-2 = 0.136, 100 degrees C/70% RH/po(2) = 0.064, and 120 degrees C/35% RH/po(2) = 0.064, which represent a near fully-humidified, a moderately humidified, and a low humidified condition, respectively. At the higher temperature operating conditions the RH and po(2), decrease resulting in higher electrode ohmic resistance (0.020, 0.020, and 0.035 ohm cm(2), respectively), lower limiting current (2019, 1314, and 819 mA/cm(2), respectively), and lower onset current density for significant electrode concentration overpotential (80, 60, and 40 mA/cm(2), respectively). The technique is useful for diagnosing the main sources of loss in MEA development work, especially for high temperature/low relative humidity operation where several sources of loss are present simultaneously. (c) 2005 The Electrochemical Society. [DOI: 10.1149/1.1860034] All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据