4.5 Article

Intravenous adenosine and dyspnea in humans

期刊

JOURNAL OF APPLIED PHYSIOLOGY
卷 98, 期 1, 页码 180-185

出版社

AMER PHYSIOLOGICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1152/japplphysiol.00913.2004

关键词

asthma; pulmonary vagal C fibers; ventilation; chemoreceptors

资金

  1. NHLBI NIH HHS [R01 HL 65486] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NATIONAL HEART, LUNG, AND BLOOD INSTITUTE [R01HL065486] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Intravenous adenosine for the treatment of supraventricular tachycardia is reported to cause bronchospasm and dyspnea and to increase ventilation in humans, but these effects have not been systematically studied. We therefore compared the effects of 10 mg of intravenous adenosine with placebo in 21 normal subjects under normoxic conditions and evaluated the temporal sequence of the effects of adenosine on ventilation, dyspnea, and heart rate. The study was repeated in 11 of these subjects during hyperoxia. In all subjects, adenosine resulted in the development of dyspnea, assessed by handgrip dynamometry, without any significant change ( P > 0.1) in lung resistance as measured by the interrupter technique. There were significant increases ( P < 0.05) in ventilation and heart rate in response to adenosine. The dyspneic response occurred slightly before the ventilatory or heart rate responses in every subject, but the timing of the dyspneic, ventilatory, and heart rate responses was not significantly different when the group data were analyzed (18.9 +/- 5.8, 20.3 +/- 5.5, and 19.7 +/- 4.5 s, respectively). During hyperoxia, adenosine resulted in similar effects, with no significant differences in the magnitude of the ventilatory response; however, compared with the normoxic state, the intensity of the dyspneic response was significantly ( P < 0.05) reduced, whereas the heart rate response increased significantly ( P < 0.05). These data indicate that intravenous adenosine-induced dyspnea is not associated with bronchospasm in normal subjects. The time latency of the response indicates that the dyspnea is probably not a consequence of peripheral chemoreceptor or brain stem respiratory center stimulation, suggesting that it is most likely secondary to stimulation of receptors in the lungs, most likely vagal C fibers.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据