4.6 Review

Spectral, electrochemical, and photophysical studies of a magnesium porphyrin-fullerene dyad

期刊

PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY CHEMICAL PHYSICS
卷 7, 期 17, 页码 3163-3171

出版社

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/b507673k

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A covalently linked magnesium porphyrin-fullerene (MgPo-C-60) dyad was synthesized and its spectral, electrochemical, molecular orbital, and photophysical properties were investigated and the results were compared to the earlier reported zinc porphyrin-fullerene (ZnPo-C-60) dyad. The ab initio B3LYP/3-21G(*) computed geometry and electronic structure of the dyad predicted that the HOMO and LUMO are mainly localized on the MgP and C-60 units, respectively. In o-dichlorobenzene containing 0.1 M (n-Bu)(4)NClO4, the synthesized dyad exhibited six one-electron reversible redox reactions within the potential window of the solvent. The oxidation and reduction potentials of the MgP and C-60 units indicate stabilization of the charge-separated state. The emission, monitored by both steady-state and time-resolved techniques, revealed efficient quenching of the singlet excited state of the MgP and C-60 units. The quenching pathway of the singlet excited MgP moiety involved energy transfer to the appended C-60 moiety, generating the singlet excited C-60 moiety, from which subsequent charge-separation occurred. The charge recombination rates, k(CR), evaluated from nanosecond transient absorption studies, were found to be 2-3 orders of magnitude smaller than the charge separation rate, k(CS). In o-dichlorobenzene, the lifetime of the radical ion-pair, MgPo center dot+-C-60(center dot-), was found to be 520 ns which is longer than that of ZnPo center dot+-C-60(center dot-) indicating better charge stabilization in MgPo-C-60. Additional prolongation of the lifetime of MgPo center dot+-C-60(center dot-) was achieved by coordinating nitrogenous axial ligands. The solvent effect in controlling the rates of forward and reverse electron transfer is also investigated.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据