4.2 Review

Detection of food intake in a marine mammal using marine osmolytes and their analogues as dietary biomarkers

期刊

MARINE ECOLOGY PROGRESS SERIES
卷 300, 期 -, 页码 213-228

出版社

INTER-RESEARCH
DOI: 10.3354/meps300213

关键词

foraging; dietary biomarker; arsenobetaine; trimethylamine N-oxide; osmolytes; lactation; Weddell seal; marine mammal

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We report a novel method of investigating foraging in marine mammals based on detecting biomarkers of strictly dietary origin in blood. Arsenobetaine (AsB), the arsenic analogue of the osmolyte glycine betaine, and trimethylamine N-oxide (TMAO), an osmolyte used by marine fish and invertebrates, were measured in plasma of lactating Weddell seals Leptonychotes weddellii during the postpartum fast and at different stages of lactation. Plasma dietary biomarker concentrations were low in early lactation (<14 d postpartum [d p.p.]; AsB: 5.5 +/- 2 ppb As, TMAO: 66 +/- 20 mu mol l(-1)) and increased 10-fold in late lactation ( >= 27 d p.p.; AsB: 57 17 ppb As, TMAO: 685 +/- 199 mu mol l(-1)). In lactating females (n = 6) monitored longitudinally, plasma TMAO remained low for the first 3 wk p.p. Increases in AsB concentrations observed in late lactation were closely correlated (Pearson correlation r = 0.96, p < 0.01, n = 6) with increases in plasma insulin-like growth factor I (IGF1), a growth factor known to reflect nutritional status in other mammals. Two seals outfitted with time-depth recorders began regular deep diving at different times p.p. and showed corresponding differences in biomarker concentrations. Our results indicate that (1) most lactating Weddell seals at the study site (70 % of 20 seals studied) feed after 3 to 4 wk p.p., (2) individual lactating Weddell seals may forage as early as 9 d p.p., and (3) some Weddell seals may consume little or no food throughout lactation. Dietary biomarkers provide a simple method for distinguishing feeding and fasting in free-living marine mammals.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据