4.2 Article

Upwelling, downwelling, and cross-shelf transport of bivalve larvae: test of a hypothesis

期刊

MARINE ECOLOGY PROGRESS SERIES
卷 302, 期 -, 页码 1-12

出版社

INTER-RESEARCH
DOI: 10.3354/meps302001

关键词

larval dispersal; larval transport; oceanography; supply-side ecology; bivalve larvae; downwelling

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Larval supply affects the structure of marine communities. Cross-shelf transport of larvae by upwelling and downwelling may cause variation in larval supply. We tested the hypothesis that slow-swimming bivalve larvae are swept offshore during upwelling and shoreward during downwelling. We sampled a transect at Duck, North Carolina during a period when currents shifted from upwelling to downwelling and back to upwelling. During each shift, nearshore water was exchanged with offshore water and currents were 10 to 100 times faster than larval swimming speeds. Larval Spisula solidissima and Ensis directus were found below the thermocline and, contrary to prediction, were swept onshore during upwelling and offshore during downwelling. When S. solidissima larvae were found above the thermocline, cross-shelf transport was as predicted. Larval Tellina spp. and Mulinia lateralis remained within 5 km of shore despite cross-shelf currents and the exchange of nearshore waters with offshore waters. They did not behave as passive particles; they were not swept off shore by upwelling or onshore by downwelling. For these taxa the hypothesis was rejected. These larvae may have remained close to shore by using behaviors analogous to those displayed by animals concentrated at convergent fronts. Given the relatively slow swimming speed of bivalve larvae, there is no reason to expect that any larval type is swept offshore by upwelling. The effect of upwelling and downwelling on larval distributions varies with larval behavior and vertical distribution. Without careful sampling, one cannot invoke offshore transport of larvae by upwelling as a cause of variations in larval settlement.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据