4.5 Article

An allometric comparison of microsomal membrane lipid composition and sodium pump molecular activity in the brain of mammals and birds

期刊

JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL BIOLOGY
卷 208, 期 2, 页码 371-381

出版社

COMPANY BIOLOGISTS LTD
DOI: 10.1242/jeb.01377

关键词

body size; cholesterol; docosahexaenoic acid; fatty acids; Na+,K+-ATPase; phospholipids

类别

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Previous research has shown that the lipid milieu surrounding membrane proteins may be an important factor in determining their activity. To investigate this we have examined sodium pump molecular activity and microsomal membrane lipid composition in the brain of five mammalian and eight avian species ranging in size from 30 g mice to 280 kg cattle and 13 g zebra finches to ;35 kg emus, respectively. Sodium pump (Na+,K+-ATPase) activity was higher in the smaller species and showed a significant allometric decline with body mass in both the mammals (mumol Pi h(-1) mg wet mass(-1) = 6.2Xmass(-0.06)) and birds (mumol Pi h(-1) mg wet mass(-1) = 5.4Xmass(-0.07)). In small mammals, the elevated enzyme activity was related to allometric changes in both the concentration and the molecular activity (turnover rate) of sodium pumps, while in birds, no significant body-size-related variation was observed for either sodium pump concentratien or molecular activity. Microsomal phospholipid fatty acid profile displayed little allometric variation in both the mammals and birds and was not correlated with molecular activity in either group. Brain phospholipids from both endothermic classes were dominated by the long chain n-3 polyunsaturate, docosahexaenoic acid [22:6 (n-3)], which accounted for an average of 28% and 34% of the total fatty acids in the mammals and birds respectively. Bird membranes also contained a relatively large percentage of 22:5 (n-6) as well as high levels of cholesterol. These results are discussed in relation to neurological function and the emerging field of membrane lipid rafts.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据