4.8 Review

Engineered antibody fragments and the rise of single domains

期刊

NATURE BIOTECHNOLOGY
卷 23, 期 9, 页码 1126-1136

出版社

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/nbt1142

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

With 18 monoclonal antibody (mAb) products currently on the market and more than 100 in clinical trials, it is clear that engineered antibodies have come of age as biopharmaceuticals. In fact, by 2008, engineered antibodies are predicted to account for > 30% of all revenues in the biotechnology market. Smaller recombinant antibody fragments ( for example, classic monovalent antibody fragments (Fab, scFv) and engineered variants (diabodies, triabodies, minibodies and single-domain antibodies) are now emerging as credible alternatives. Smaller recombinant antibody fragments ( for example, classic monovalent antibody fragments ( Fab, scFv)) and engineered variants ( diabodies, triabodies, minibodies and single-domain antibodies) are now emerging as credible alternatives. These fragments retain the targeting specificity of whole mAbs but can be produced more economically and possess other unique and superior properties for a range of diagnostic and therapeutic applications. Antibody fragments have been forged into multivalent and multispecific reagents, linked to therapeutic payloads ( such as radionuclides, toxins, enzymes, liposomes and viruses) and engineered for enhanced therapeutic efficacy. Recently, single antibody domains have been engineered and selected as targeting reagents against hitherto immunosilent cavities in enzymes, receptors and infectious agents. Single-domain antibodies are anticipated to significantly expand the repertoire of antibody-based reagents against the vast range of novel biomarkers being discovered through proteomics. As this review aims to show, there is tremendous potential for all antibody fragments either as robust diagnostic reagents ( for example in biosensors), or as nonimmunogenic in vivo biopharmaceuticals with superior biodistribution and blood clearance properties.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据