4.0 Article

Arterial wall response to ex vivo exposure to oscillatory shear stress

期刊

JOURNAL OF VASCULAR RESEARCH
卷 42, 期 6, 页码 535-544

出版社

KARGER
DOI: 10.1159/000088343

关键词

arterial metabolism; atherosclerosis; matrix metalloproteinases; oscillation; plasminogen activator inhibitor-1; shear stress

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: The aim of this study was to analyze the arterial wall response to plaque-prone hemodynamic environments, known to occur mainly in areas of arterial trees such as bifurcations and branching points. In these areas, the vasculature is exposed to cyclically reversing flow that induces an endothelial dysfunction predisposing thus arteries to local development of atherosclerotic plaques. Methods: We used an ex vivo perfusion system that allows culturing arterial segments under different hemodynamic conditions. Porcine carotid arteries were exposed for 3 days to unidirectional high and low shear stress (6 +/- 3 and 0.3 +/- 0.1 dyn/cm(2)) as well as to oscillatory shear stress (0.3 +/- 3 dyn/cm(2)). This latter condition mimics the hemodynamics present at plaque-prone areas. At the end of the perfusion, the influence of different flow patterns on arterial metabolism was assessed in terms of matrix turnover as well as of smooth muscle cell function, differentiation and migration. Results: Our results show that after 3 days of perfusion none of the applied conditions influence smooth muscle cell phenotype retaining their full contraction capacity. However, an increase in the expression level of matrix metalloproteinase-2 and -9, as well as a decrease in plasminogen activator inhibitor-1 expression were observed in arteries exposed to oscillatory shear stress when compared to arteries exposed to unidirectional shear stress. Conclusion: These observations suggest that plaque-prone hemodynamic environment triggers a vascular wall remodelling process and promotes changes in arterial wall metabolism, with important implication in atherogenesis. Copyright (C) 2005 S. Karger AG, Basel.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.0
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据