4.7 Article

Adsorptive removal of pharmaceuticals from water by commercial and waste-based carbons

期刊

JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
卷 152, 期 -, 页码 83-90

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS LTD- ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2015.01.019

关键词

Remediation; Environment; Pyrolysis; Paper mill sludge; Activated carbon

资金

  1. European Funds through COMPETE
  2. National Funds through the Portuguese Science Foundation (FCT) [PEst-C/MAR/LA0017/2013]
  3. FCT [SFRH/BPD/78645/2011, SFRH/BD/88965/2012]
  4. Spanish Ministry of Science and Innovation [RYC-2010-05634]
  5. Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia [SFRH/BD/88965/2012] Funding Source: FCT

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This work describes the single adsorption of seven pharmaceuticals (carbamazepine, oxazepatn, sulfamethoxazole, piroxicam, cetirizine, venlafaxine and paroxetine) from water onto a commercially available activated carbon and a non-activated carbon produced by pyrolysis of primary paper mill sludge. Kinetics and equilibrium adsorption studies were performed using a batch experimental approach. For all pharmaceuticals, both carbons presented fast kinetics (equilibrium times varying from less than 5 min to 120 min), mainly described by a pseudo-second order model. Equilibrium data were appropriately described by the Langmuir and Freundlich isotherm models, the last one giving slightly higher correlation coefficients. The fitted parameters obtained for both models were quite different for the seven pharmaceuticals under study. In order to evaluate the influence of water solubility, log K-ow, pKa, polar surface area and number of hydrogen bond acceptors of pharmaceuticals on the adsorption parameters, multiple linear regression analysis was performed. The variability is mainly due to log K-ow followed by water solubility, in the case of the waste-based carbon, and due to water solubility in the case of the commercial activated carbon. (C) 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据