4.4 Article

Iodoacetamide-alkylated methionine can mimic neutral loss of phosphoric acid from phosphopeptides as exemplified by nano-electrospray ionization quadrupole time-of-flight parent ion scanning

期刊

RAPID COMMUNICATIONS IN MASS SPECTROMETRY
卷 19, 期 12, 页码 1709-1716

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/rcm.1976

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Formation of S-carbamidomethylmethionine (camMet) occurs as a side reaction during cysteine alkylation with iodoacetamide (IAA). In collision-induced dissociation, peptides with camMet show an abundant neutral loss of 2-(methylthio)acetamide (C3H7NOS=105.025 Da) at moderate collision offset values which are similar to those optimal for loss of phosphoric acid (H3PO4 = 97.977 Da). Neutral loss analysis is used for spotting of phosphopeptides which contain phosphoserine (pSer) or phosphothreonine (pThr) residues. In the case where precursor ions cannot be accurately assigned in the survey spectrum (e.g. due to low ion abundance or signal overlap), the mass accuracy of a neutral loss tandem mass spectrometry (MS/MS) analysis depends on the precursor ion isolation window. For the charge states 2+, 3+ or 4+, a typical 3.5 Da precursor isolation window results in neutral loss windows of 7, 10.5 or 14 Da, respectively. Consequently, neutral loss of 105 Da from alkylated methionine residues can mimic the phosphoserine/phosphothreonine-specific neutral loss of 98 Da. In the evaluation of quadrupole time-of-flight (QTOF) parent ion scan data for neutral loss of H3PO4, this interference was frequently observed. It is illustrated in this study using the analysis of ovalbumin phosphorylation as an example. The +80 Da molecular weight shift connected with phosphorylation at serine or threonine may also be mimicked by carbamidomethylation of methionine through a combination with sodium adduction (+57 Da+22 Da = +79 Da). For highly sensitive neutral loss analysis of serine and threonine phosphorylation, careful data inspection is recommended if reduction and alkylation by IAA is employed. Copyright (c) 2005 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据