4.7 Article

Metabotropic glutamate receptor 2 modulates excitatory synaptic transmission in the rat globus pallidus

期刊

NEUROPHARMACOLOGY
卷 49, 期 -, 页码 57-69

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuropharm.2005.03.006

关键词

metabotropic glutamate receptors; group II; globus pallidus; excitatory transmission; allosteric modulators; Parkinson's disease

资金

  1. NIGMS NIH HHS [T32 GM008169] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF GENERAL MEDICAL SCIENCES [T32GM008169] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER

向作者/读者索取更多资源

While group II metabotropic glutarnate receptors (mGluRs) are known to be expressed in the rat globus pallidus (GP), their functions remain poorly understood. We used standard patch clamping technique-in GP slices to determine the effect of group II mGluR activation on excitatory transmission in this region. Activation of group II mGluRs with the group-selective agonist DCGIV or APDC reduced the amplitude of the evoked excitatory postsynaptic currents (EPSCs) and significantly increased the paired pulse ratio suggesting a presynaptic site of action. This was further supported by double-labeling electron microscopy data showing that group II mGluRs (mGluR2 and 3) immunoreactivity is localized in glutamatergic pre-terminal axons and terminals in the GP. Furthermore, we found that LY 487379, an mGluR2-specific allosteric modulator, significantly potentiated the inhibitory effect of DCG-IV on the excitatory transmission in the GP. Co-incubation with 30 mu M LY 487379 increased the potency of DCG-IV about 10-fold in the GP. We were thus able to pharmacologically isolate the mGluR2-mediated function in the rat GP using an mGluR2-specific allosteric modulator. Therefore, our findings do not only shed light on the functions of group II mGluRs in the GP, they also illustrate the therapeutic potential of mGluR-targeting allosteric modulators in neurological disorders such as Parkinson's disease. (c) 2005 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据