4.8 Article

API5 Confers Tumoral Immune Escape through FGF2-Dependent Cell Survival Pathway

期刊

CANCER RESEARCH
卷 74, 期 13, 页码 3556-3566

出版社

AMER ASSOC CANCER RESEARCH
DOI: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-13-3225

关键词

-

类别

资金

  1. Korea Healthcare Technology R&D Project, Ministry for Health, Welfare and Family Affairs, Republic of Korea [A080816]
  2. National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) - Korea government (MEST) [2012R1A2A2A01007527, 2013M3A9D3045881, 2013M3A9D3045719]
  3. KICOS [K20703001994-12A0500-03610]
  4. MEST [2012K001404]
  5. Korea Health Promotion Institute [A080816] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)
  6. National Research Foundation of Korea [2013M3A9D3045719, 2012R1A2A2A01007527] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Identifying immune escape mechanisms used by tumors may define strategies to sensitize them to immunotherapies to which they are otherwise resistant. In this study, we show that the antiapoptotic gene API5 acts as an immune escape gene in tumors by rendering them resistant to apoptosis triggered by tumor antigen-specific T cells. Its RNAi-mediated silencing in tumor cells expressing high levels of API5 restored antigen-specific immune sensitivity. Conversely, introducing API5 into API5(low) cells conferred immune resistance. Mechanistic investigations revealed that API5 mediated resistance by upregulating FGF2 signaling through a FGFR1/PKC delta/ERK effector pathway that triggered degradation of the proapoptotic molecule BIM. Blockade of FGF2, PKC delta, or ERK phenocopied the effect of API5 silencing in tumor cells expressing high levels of API5 to either murine or human antigen-specific T cells. Our results identify a novel mechanism of immune escape that can be inhibited to potentiate the efficacy of targeted active immunotherapies. (C) 2014 AACR.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据