4.7 Article

Effects of Amphotericin B on ion transport proteins in airway epithelial cells

期刊

JOURNAL OF CELLULAR PHYSIOLOGY
卷 204, 期 3, 页码 859-870

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/jcp.20347

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Topical intranasal application of the antifungal Amphotericin B (AmphoB) has been shown as an effective medical treatment of chronic rhinosinusitis. Because this antibiotic forms channels in lipid membranes, we considered the possibility that it affects the properties and/or cell surface expression of ion channels/pumps, and consequently transepithelial ion transport. Human nasal epithelia[ cells were exposed apically to AmphoB (50 mu M) for 4 h, 5 days (4 h daily), and 4 weeks (4 h daily, 5 days weekly) and allowed to recover for 18-48 h. AmphoB significantly reduced transepithelial potential difference, short-circuit current, and the amiloride-sensitive current. This was not due to generalized cellular toxicity as judged from normal transepithelial resistance and mitochondrial activity, butwas related to inhibitory effects of AmphoB on ion transport proteins. Thus, cells exposed to AmphoB for 4 h showed decreased apical epithelial sodium channels (ENaC) activity with no change in basolateral Na'K'-ATPase activity and K+ conductance, and reduced amount of alpha ENaC, alpha 1-Na+K+-ATPase, and NKCC1 proteins at the cell membrane, but no change in mRNA levels. After a 5-day treatment, there was a significant decrease in Na+K+-ATPase activity. After a 4-week treatment, a decrease in basolateral K+ conductance and in alpha ENaC and alpha 1-Na+K+-ATPase mRNA levels was also observed. These findings may reflect a feedback mechanism aimed to limit cellular Na+ overload and K+ depletion subsequently to formation of AmphoB pores in the cell membrane. Thus, the decreased Na+ absorption induced by AmphoB resulted from reduced cell surface expression of the ENaC, Na+K+-ATPase pump and NKCC1 and not from direct inhibition of their activities.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据