4.5 Review

NMDA antagonists and neuropathic pain - Multiple drug targets and multiple uses

期刊

CURRENT PHARMACEUTICAL DESIGN
卷 11, 期 23, 页码 2977-2994

出版社

BENTHAM SCIENCE PUBL LTD
DOI: 10.2174/1381612054865082

关键词

glutamate receptors; neuropathic pain; nociception; animal models; NR2B antagonists; glycineB antagonists

向作者/读者索取更多资源

NMDA (N-methyl-D-aspartate) receptors are one class of ionotropic receptor for the ubiquitous excitatory neurotransmitter L-glutamate. The receptor is made up of four protein subunits combined from a larger library of proteins, which gives this receptor a great deal of variability. This explains the large number of modulatory sites, a variety of sites at which antagonists can interact, and therefore a number of potential drug targets. Sensitivity of the NMDA ion channel to ambient levels of Mg++ gives it a voltage dependence that suits a function of responding to intense synaptic activation; the ability of the channel to admit Ca++ tends to trigger long-term processes. The receptor is thereby involved in long-term physiological processes such as learning and memory as well as in pathological processes such as neuropathic pain. Separating these functions therapeutically with NMDA antagonists has been a major difficulty, and has not yet been achieved with currently-available agents. This review summarises the preclinical rationale, based on animal models, and the clinical evidence on the use of NMDA antagonists in pain states. It also summarises the details of the receptor so as to explain the rationale for targeting either specific sites on the receptor, or exploiting anatomical differences in subtype expression, so as to provide the beneficial effects of NMDA receptor block with an improved side effect profile. In particular, agents that are selective for receptors that include the NR2B subunit preclinically have a substantially better profile for treating neuropathic pain than do current NMDA antagonists; some emerging clinical evidence supports this view.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据