4.6 Article

Malonyl-CoA and carnitine in regulation of fat oxidation in human skeletal muscle during exercise

出版社

AMER PHYSIOLOGICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1152/ajpendo.00379.2004

关键词

acetylcarnitine; acetyl coenzyme A; pyruvate dehydrogenase activity; adenosine 5 '-monosphosphate-activated protein kinase; acetyl coenzyme A carboxylase

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Intracellular mechanisms regulating fat oxidation were investigated in human skeletal muscle during exercise. Eight young, healthy, moderately trained men performed bicycle exercise (60 min, 65% peak O-2 consumption) on two occasions, where they ingested either 1) a high-carbohydrate diet (H-CHO) or 2) a low-carbohydrate diet (L-CHO) before exercise to alter muscle glycogen content as well as to induce, respectively, low and high rates of fat oxidation. Leg fat oxidation was 122% higher during exercise in L-CHO than in H-CHO ( P < 0.001). In keeping with this, the activity of α(2)-AMP-activated protein kinase (α(2)-AMPK) was increased twice as much in L-CHO as in H-CHO ( P < 0.01) at 60 min of exercise. However, acetyl-CoA carboxylase (ACC)beta Ser(221) phosphorylation was increased to the same extent (6-fold) under the two conditions. The concentration of malonyl-CoA was reduced 13% by exercise in both conditions ( P < 0.05). Pyruvate dehydrogenase activity was higher during exercise in H-CHO than in L-CHO ( P < 0.01). In H-CHO only, the concentrations of acetyl-CoA and acetylcarnitine were increased ( P < 0.001), and the concentration of free carnitine was decreased ( P < 0.01), by exercise. The data suggest that a decrease in the concentration of malonyl-CoA, secondary to alpha(2)-AMPK activation and ACC inhibition ( by phosphorylation), contributes to the increase in fat oxidation observed at the onset of exercise regardless of muscle glycogen levels. They also suggest that, with high muscle glycogen, the availability of free carnitine may limit fat oxidation during exercise, due to its increased use for acetylcarnitine formation.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据