4.7 Article

Distribution of the fungal endophyte Neotyphodium lolii is not a major determinant of the distribution of fungal alkaloids in Lolium perenne plants

期刊

PHYTOCHEMISTRY
卷 66, 期 2, 页码 195-202

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.phytochem.2004.11.021

关键词

Lolium perenne; Neotyphodium lolli; poaceae; alkaloid distribution; ergot alkaloids; indole-ditterpenoids; ergovaline; lolitrem B; peramine; GUS-reporter gene

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The relationships of the distributions of the insect and mammalian mycotoxins, lolitrem B and ergovaline, and the insect-feeding deterrent, peramine, with the distribution of fungal mycelium were investigated in three genotypes of perennial ryegrass (Lolium perenne L.) infected with the endophyte Neotyphodium lolii. In planta levels and distribution of the endophyte and of the three alkaloids were assessed in parallel, and different spatial or temporal concentration gradients were observed for each. Variation in the tissue distribution of the endophyte accounted only for 20%, 6%, and 31% of the variation in ergovaline, lolitrem 13, and peramine, respectively. Alkaloid-endophyte ratios, determined in individual grass tissues, showed distinct in planta distribution patterns for each alkaloid and differed in magnitude among genotypes. The ergovaline-endophyte ratio was higher in the very basal plant tissues than in the apical tissues, while the lolitrem B and peramine ratios tended to be higher in apical tissues. The lolitrem B-endophyte ratio increased with leaf age, while no consistent temporal trends were detected for the other alkaloids. The results indicate that endophyte colonisation is a minor determinant of alkaloid levels, and that accumulation of the alkaloids relative to the endophyte mycelium is affected by plant genotype and tissue in a manner specific to each alkaloid. Possible factors in the regulation of alkaloid levels in the grass plant are discussed. (C) 2004 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据