4.3 Article

Use of macrolides and tetracyclines for chronic inflammatory diseases

期刊

ANNALS OF PHARMACOTHERAPY
卷 39, 期 1, 页码 86-94

出版社

SAGE PUBLICATIONS INC
DOI: 10.1345/aph.1E282

关键词

acne; blepharitis; cardiovascular disease; cystic fibrosis; macrolides; periodontitis; rheumatoid arthritis; rosacea; tetracyclines

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective: To review the efficacy of macrolides and tetracyclines in several chronic inflammatory conditions. Data Sources: Searches of MEDLINE (1966-March 2004) and an extensive bibliography search were undertaken. Key terms included acne, blepharitis, cardiovascular disease, cystic fibrosis, periodontitis, rosacea, and rheumatoid arthritis. Study Selection and Data Extraction: Data were obtained primarily from randomized placebo-controlled trials upon which key recommendations are based. Data Synthesis: Antibiotics are often prescribed for months or even years for treatment of chronic inflammatory conditions such as acne, blepharitis, cardiovascular disease, cystic fibrosis, periodontitis, rosacea, and rheumatoid arthritis. Randomized controlled trials have shown that azithromycin is useful in the management of cystic fibrosis and the tetracyclines are beneficial in the management of rheumatoid arthritis, acne, blepharitis, and periodontitis. Several large, randomized controlled trials have failed to show any benefit of macrolides in the secondary prevention of cardiovascular disease. No randomized placebo-controlled clinical trials have been performed to assess the efficacy of macrolides or tetracyclines in patients with rosacea. Conclusions: The use of tetracyclines and macrolides for rosacea is based primarily on anecdotal reports or open-label trials. Limited clinical trials support the use of tetracyclines or macrolides in acne, blepharitis, periodontitis, rheumatoid arthritis, and cystic fibrosis. Trials to date do not support the use of antibiotics for secondary prevention of cardiovascular disease.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据