4.4 Article

Mutation screening of the mitochondrial genome using denaturing high-performance liquid chromatography

期刊

MOLECULAR GENETICS AND METABOLISM
卷 84, 期 1, 页码 61-74

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.ymgme.2004.09.011

关键词

mutation detection; mitochondrial genome; DHPLC; pyrosequencing; heteroplasmy; DNA

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Over 170 known mutations of the mitochondrial genome are responsible for disease. Due to the unique features of mitochondrial genetics, such patients are clinically diverse and difficult to diagnose. As pathogenic mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) mutations are mostly heteroplasmic, denaturing high-performance liquid chromatography (DHPLC) could be used to detect these heteroplasmic species and therefore act as a rapid screening test for mtDNA mutations. The entire mitochondrial genome was amplified by PCR in 40 overlapping regions. In addition, known mtDNA mutants were constructed for each of these regions using a PCR-based site-directed mutagenesis approach. These mutants were used as positive controls and showed a detection limit of 3-10% heteroplasmy by DHPLC (depending on the specific mutation) compared to 40% for conventional sequencing. To further validate the screening test, mtDNA from 17 patients with seven different pathogenic mutations was used to compare mutation detection by DHPLC and conventional sequencing. DHPLC had a sensitivity of 88% compared to 82% for sequencing. This increased to 100% sensitivity for DHPLC when excluding the m.8993T>G mutation. DHPLC analysis is therefore a sensitive, rapid and cost-effective method to screen for mutations in the mitochondrial genome. The role of pyrosequencing in the quantitation of mutant load for known mtDNA mutations was highlighted using the m,3243A>G mutation as an illustrative example. Pyrosequencing analysis was able to discriminate samples containing as little as 5% heteroplasmy and proved to be an accurate and reproducible method for estimation of mutant load. (C) 2004 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据