4.1 Article

John Montgomery's legacy: Carbocyclic adenosine analogues as SAH hydrolase inhibitors with broad-spectrum antiviral activity

期刊

NUCLEOSIDES NUCLEOTIDES & NUCLEIC ACIDS
卷 24, 期 10-12, 页码 1395-1415

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS INC
DOI: 10.1080/15257770500265638

关键词

S-adenosylhomocysteine (AdoHcy, SAH); adenosine analogues; carbocyclic adenosine analogues; acyclic adenosine analogues; carbocyclic 3-deazaadenosine (C-c(3) Ado); 3-deazaneplanocin A; poxviruses (vaccinia virus); hemorrhagic fever viruses (Ebola virus); rhabdoviruses (vesicular stomatitis virus); paramyxoviruses

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Ever since the S-adenosylhomocysteine (AdoHcy, SAH) hydrolase was recognized as a pharmacological target for antiviral agents (J. A. Montgomery et al., J. Med. Chem. 25:626-629, 1982), an increasing number of adenosine, acyclic adenosine, and carbocyclic adenosine analogues have been described as potent SAH hydrolase inhibitors endowed with broad-spectrum antiviral activity. The antiviral activity spectrum of the SAH hydrolase inhibitors include pox-, rhabdo-, filo-, arena-, paramyxo-, reo-, and retroviruses. Among the most potent SAH hydrolase inhibitors and antiviral agents rank carbocyclic 3-deazaadenosine (C-c(3) Ado), neplanocin A, 3-deazaneplanocin A, the 5'-nor derivatives of carbocyclic adenosine (C-Ado, aristeromycin), and the 2-halo (i.e., 2-fluoro) and 6'- R -alkyl (i.e., 6' -R -methyl) derivatives of neplanocin A. These compounds are particularly active against poxviruses (i.e., vaccinia virus), and rhabdoviruses (i.e., vesicular stomatitis virus). The in vivo efficacy of C-c(3) Ado and 3-deazaneplanocin A has been established in mouse models for vaccinia virus, vesicular stomatitis virus, and Ebola virus. SAH hydrolase inhibitors such as C-c(3) Ado and 3-deazaneplanocin A should in the first place be considered for therapeutic (or prophylactic) use against poxvirus infections, including smallpox, and hemorrhagic fever virus infections such as Ebola.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.1
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据