4.4 Article

Enumerating antigen-specific T-Cell responses in peripheral blood - A comparison of peptide MHC tetramer, ELISpot, and intracellular cytokine analysis

期刊

JOURNAL OF IMMUNOTHERAPY
卷 28, 期 1, 页码 63-72

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/00002371-200501000-00008

关键词

CMV; T cell; ELISpot; peptide MHC tetramer; protective immunity

资金

  1. NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE [U54CA090818, P01CA078673] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER
  2. NCI NIH HHS [P01-CA78673, U54 CA90818] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Detection of the circulating antigen-specific T-cell response to immunization is an important biologic end point in clinical trials of cancer vaccines. Typically employed assays are peptide MHC tetramer, ELISpot, and intracellular cytokine analysis. Although there is no agreement on the definition of a positive response in these assays, many groups have chosen a number of T cells greater than 2 standard deviations above the mean of the negative controls. The authors wished to determine how well this cutoff performed for each of these assays in detecting positive and negative T-cell responses to a model antigen, the immunodominant HLA-A*0201-restricted epitope of cytomegalovirus (CMV) pp65. For each assay, the mean + 2 standard deviations of the response for CMV seronegatives was the point that best separated the two groups. Using this value, each assay had a sensitivity of 87.5% and specificity of 95% to 100% and exhibited a high degree of concordance (kappa 0.76-0.9) with the other two. The authors conclude that currently available immunologic assays perform well in detecting biologically relevant levels of antigen-specific T cells. These assays will better define the quantity and quality of protective immune responses to viral disease and offer insight into the requirements for protective anti-cancer immunity.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据