4.7 Article

Can P-31 NMR spectroscopy be used to indicate the origins of soil organic phosphates?

期刊

SOIL BIOLOGY & BIOCHEMISTRY
卷 37, 期 1, 页码 15-25

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.soilbio.2004.07.022

关键词

soil organic P; P-31 NMR spectroscopy; microbial P; plant P; diester phosphates; monoester phosphates

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The relationship between organic P status of 4 soils, 20 microorganisms isolated from these soils (2 bacteria and 3 fungi for each soil) and 13 dominant plant species of typical natural ecosystems of these soils was evaluated. The soils used were represented by two pairs with different ratios of monoester and diester P, and of DNA and other diester P. A Dystric Podzoluvisol and an alpine Umbric Leptosol were characterized by a relatively high proportion of diester P including much DNA P, while a Calcic Chernozem and subalpine Umbric Leptosol had lower proportion of diesters containing relatively less DNA P. The proportions of P compounds in bacteria and plants were very similar on average, based on the monoester to diester P ratio and on the proportions of different diesters in alkaline extract, whereas fungi contained considerably higher proportions of monoesters and polyphosphates, and a higher proportion of phospholipids in the diester fraction. The results showed that the P,g composition of NaOH extracts from different soils was more similar to the composition of extracts from different groups of microorganisms. There was no clear correspondence between soil and microbial diester P proportion and composition. A high proportion of polyphosphate P including pyrophosphate P in soil extracts indicates a significant contribution of fungal P compounds in the soil while the monoester to diester P ratio, and DNA to non-DNA P ratio should be used with caution to interpret the origins of soil P-org. The relative contributions of microorganisms and plants to monoester and diester P in soils is only partially understood. 0 2004 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据