4.5 Article

Validity of procedures involved in ultrasound-based measurement of human plantarflexor tendon elongation on contraction

期刊

JOURNAL OF BIOMECHANICS
卷 38, 期 1, 页码 9-13

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2004.03.024

关键词

tendon; ultrasound; test validity

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Ultrasonography is becoming increasingly popular for studying the tensile behaviour of in vivo human tendons through elongation measurements during isometric contraction. For the plantarflexor tendons specifically, which receive much attention due to their functional role in locomotion, elongations are conventionally measured by fixing the scanning probe on the calf. Elongation corrections are also made to account for artifactual ankle rotations during the isometric test, by assuming that these occur round the tibio-talar joint axis, as is the case for passive ankle plantarflexion-dorsiflexion rotations. The present work was set out to examine the validity of these procedures. The displacement of the calcaneum, a skin marker on the calf, and the gastrocnemius myotendinous junction, were measured from rest to maximum isometric voluntary plantarflexion contraction (MVC) in six men by using ultrasound probes mounted on externally fixed points (active test). A passive ankle plantarflexion rotation equal in magnitude to that recorded during MVC was then performed (passive test). In the active test, the calcaneum and the skin marker shifted in the proximo-distal direction by similar to 13 mm. Moreover, the calcaneal displacements in the active and passive tests took place round different rotational axes, as indicated by a calcaneal displacement difference of similar to 10 mm between the two tests. These effects resulted in underestimating by 35% the actual elongation of the gastrocnernius tendon when following.the currently suggested procedures. The present results directly invalidate the procedures conventionally followed for assessing the tensile response of the human plantarflexor tendons with ultrasonography. (C) 2004 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据