4.5 Article

Students' and assessors' attitudes towards students' self-assessment of their personal and professional behaviours

期刊

MEDICAL EDUCATION
卷 39, 期 1, 页码 30-39

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2929.2004.02030.x

关键词

education, medical, undergraduate, standards; professional competence, standards; social behaviour; self-assessment (psychology); attitude; faculty; students, medical; focus groups; feedback

向作者/读者索取更多资源

INTRODUCTION Previous research has demonstrated self-assessment inaccuracy in medical students. This study aims to examine students' and assessors' attitudes towards students' self-assessment of personal and professional behaviours. METHODS Thirty participants (18 Year 1 medical students and 12 personal and professional development assessors) participated in 4 semistructured focus group discussions in April and May 2003. All discussions were audio-taped and transcribed verbatim and the transcripts were theme analysed independently by 2 analysts. RESULTS Assessors and students perceived accurate self-assessment to be difficult for students and feedback was deemed to be crucial in helping students develop accurate self-assessment of their personal and professional behaviours. Assessors thought that some students had unrealistically high expectations of their own performance and this was thought to be due to various factors, such as previous academic success and gender. Assessors felt that students with high expectations of their own performance exhibited difficult behaviours if they failed to achieve their expectations. Students suggested that the school and the assessors had too high a level of expectation of their personal and professional behaviours, leading them to underestimate students' performance. DISCUSSION These difficulties surrounding self-assessment accuracy support the findings reported in previous literature and suggest that medical educators should encourage students to self-assess their own performance wherever possible. These results need to be triangulated with other sources of data such as expert panels or quantitative data.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据