4.6 Article

Risk and protective factors for fires, burns, and carbon monoxide poisoning in US households

期刊

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PREVENTIVE MEDICINE
卷 28, 期 1, 页码 102-108

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.amepre.2004.09.014

关键词

-

资金

  1. EUNICE KENNEDY SHRIVER NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF CHILD HEALTH &HUMAN DEVELOPMENT [F31HD043696] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER
  2. NICHD NIH HHS [F31 HD043696-02, F31 HD043696-01, F31 HD043696] Funding Source: Medline
  3. ODCDC CDC HHS [R49/CCR402444] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: More needs to be known about the prevalence of risk and protective factors for fires, burns, and carbon monoxide poisoning in U.S. households. Methods: A random-digit-dial survey was conducted about home safety with 1003 respondents representing households in the continental United States. Descriptive statistics assess the prevalence of risk and protective factors for fires, burns, and carbon monoxide overall, and by demographic characteristics, household structure, region, and residential tenure. The data were weighted to adjust for nonresponse and to reflect the U.S. population. Results: Although most respondents reported having a smoke alarm (97%), and 80% reported having one on each level of their home, <20% reported checking the alarm at least every 3 months. Seventy-one percent reported having a fire extinguisher, 29% had a carbon monoxide detectcor, and 51% of those living with at least one other person bad a fire escape plan. Few could report the temperature of their hot water at the tap (9%), or the setting on the hot water heater (25%). Only 6% had art antiscald device. Conclusions: Results suggest that there is Much room for improvement regarding adoption of measures to prevent fires, burns, and carbon monoxide poisoning. Further investigations of the n n efficacy of carbon monoxide detectors, fire extinguishers, and escape plans, as well as effectiveness Studies of fire and burn-prevention efforts are needed. (C) 2005 American journal of Preventive Medicine.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据