4.7 Article

Multi-objective hierarchical genetic algorithm for interpretable fuzzy rule-based knowledge extraction

期刊

FUZZY SETS AND SYSTEMS
卷 149, 期 1, 页码 149-186

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.fss.2004.07.013

关键词

interpretability; hierarchical chromosome formulation; fuzzy rule base simplification; multi-objective decision making; recursive least square method

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A new scheme based on multi-objective hierarchical genetic algorithm (MOHGA) is proposed to extract interpretable rule-based knowledge from data. The approach is derived from the use of multiple objective genetic algorithm (MOGA), where the genes of the chromosome are arranged into control genes and parameter genes. These genes are in a hierarchical form so that the control genes can manipulate the parameter genes in a more effective manner. The effectiveness of this chromosome formulation enables the fuzzy sets and rules to be optimally reduced. Some important concepts about the interpretability are introduced and the fitness function in the MOGA will consider both the accuracy and interpretability of the fuzzy model. In order to remove the redundancy of the rule base proactively, we further apply an interpretability-driven simplification method to newborn individuals. In our approach, we first apply the fuzzy clustering to generate an initial rule-based model. Then the multi-objective hierarchical genetic algorithm and the recursive least square method are used to obtain the optimized fuzzy models. The accuracy and the interpretability of fuzzy models derived by this approach are studied and presented in this paper. We compare our work with other methods reported in the literature on four examples: a synthetic nonlinear dynamic system, a nonlinear static system, the Lorenz system and the Mackey-Glass system. Simulation results show that the proposed approach is effective and practical in knowledge extraction. (C) 2004 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据