4.7 Article

Parallel methods for optimality criteria-based topology optimization

期刊

COMPUTER METHODS IN APPLIED MECHANICS AND ENGINEERING
卷 194, 期 34-35, 页码 3637-3667

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.cma.2004.08.008

关键词

topology optimization; parallel computing; preconditioners

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Topology optimization problems require the repeated solution of finite element problems that are often extremely ill-conditioned due to highly heterogeneous material distributions. This makes the use of iterative linear solvers inefficient unless appropriate preconditioning is used. Even then, the solution time for topology optimization problems is typically very high. These problems are addressed by considering the use of non-overlapping domain decomposition based parallel methods for the solution of topology optimization problems. The parallel algorithms presented here are based on the solid isotropic material with penalization (SIMP) formulation of the topology optimization problem and use the optimality criteria method for iterative optimization. We consider three parallel linear solvers to solve the equilibrium problem at each step of the iterative optimization procedure. These include two preconditioned conjugate gradient (PCG) methods: one using a diagonal preconditioner and one using an incomplete LU factorization preconditioner with a drop tolerance. A third substructuring solver that employs a hybrid of direct and iterative (PCG) techniques is also studied. This solver is found to be the most effective of the three solvers studied, both in terms of parallel efficiency and in terms of its ability to mitigate the effects of ill-conditioning. In addition to examining parallel linear solvers, we consider the parallelization of the iterative optimality criteria method. To tackle checkerboarding and mesh dependence, we propose a multi-pass filtering technique that limits the number of ghost elements that need to be exchanged across interprocessor boundaries. (c) 2004 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据